O31 - Innovation and Invention: Processes and IncentivesReturn

In this paper we are concerned with the impact the public sector has on private sector innovation. Perhaps the most important issue is whether public sector innovation, or lack of it, impacts upon private sector firms. But we are also concern the extent perceptions of innovation across jurisdictions and also the characteristics of firms, which benefit from public sector innovation. There is a particular focus on the role of the Internet. In doing this we make use of Eurobarometer data on firms and their attitudes to public sector innovation. We have established that firms benefit from public sector innovation. The factors, which impact on growth, include improvements due to Internet form filling and the reduction in the government's response time with respect to government services. The factors that impact on firm innovation, which may be tomorrow's growth, include the access to information on government services and also factors, which reduce costs.

Innovation activities at firm-level are often significantly influenced by factors that determine the outcome of the innovation process. The primary aim of this paper is to study and empirically verify the role of several determinants that affect company innovations in the European Union. The dataset for the analysis comes from Flash Eurobarometer 394 survey carried out in early 2014 and covers issues related to innovation activities, commercialization of innovation and also public support. We summarize the answers on selected questions from the survey by country, and subsequently based on the dataset, we perform regression analysis. In line with our primary assumptions, our results suggest that R&D activities on firm-level and their support represent the key factors substantially responsible for innovations. The work emphasizes the importance of firm characteristics and substantial differences between different types of innovation. Public sector support of innovation is also crucial.

Traditional model of management is based on hierarchical decomposition of organizational structure. Company is divided on workroom, union, partitions and every formation of his has independent agenda and his responsibility. However the formations often have tendency create about themselves barrier, especially communications and informatics barrier. Compared to that, process management is relatively new view of organization that moves activities of many companies. Process organization tries organizing and managing the work like comprehensive complex, which is of further distributed on individual sub-processes, which are logically linked. It is known; that the BPM is exploited in many line productions, nonproductive and tertiary sphere and his conventions pays in the same way in all lines. This statement I can corroborate thanks to my research results (below). Within the overall context of this research, we have understood the aspects of BPM to mean: a view and standpoint on the problems and issues related to the management of enterprises` processes and this includes such areas as aims, factors, components, support as well as the benefits of BPM itself. As it was indicated in the title of this paper, we mainly concentrate here on presenting the main results of the last-mentioned research area, i.e. where we evaluate the benefits of PM from the managements of Czech enterprises` point-of-view. The results are shown as a summary of all of the companies (respondents), of which there were 132.