European Financial and Accounting Journal 2022, 17(3):5-21 | DOI: 10.18267/j.efaj.273

Do Damodaran’s Multiples Value a Company Accurately? Evidence from Germany

Martin Husák
Prague University of Economics and Business, Faculty of Finance and Accounting, Department of Corporate Finance, Prague, Czech Republic

The article examines the market valuation approach using industry market multiples as this method has recently attracted increasing interest from appraisers. It investigates whether constructing one’s own industry market multiples for company valuation which are based on a market approach provides better results than using Damodaran’s market multiples in terms of the resulting valuation accuracy. The study uses a sample of 162 German companies publicly traded in 2010–2019 and analyses some of the most frequently adopted multiples: EV/EBITDA, P/BV and P/E. Moreover, the presented results may guide the appraisers in selecting the most appropriate valuation approach. Based on the statistical error analysis, the results prove better valuation accuracy of the own-built market multiples compared to Damodaran’s multiples. Nevertheless, this study is limited to German listed companies and should not be relied upon with respect to other European markets. Furthermore, its scope is limited to only 15 industries which are listed by Damodaran and subsequently included in the test sample.

Keywords: Business Valuation, Market Multiples, Damodaran, Valuation Accuracy
JEL classification: G30, G32

Published: December 31, 2022  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Husák, M. (2022). Do Damodaran’s Multiples Value a Company Accurately? Evidence from Germany. European Financial and Accounting Journal, 17(3), 5-21. doi: 10.18267/j.efaj.273
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Alford, A. W., 1992. The Effect of the Set of Comparable Firms on the Accuracy of the Price-Earnings Valuation Method. Journal of Accounting Research, 30(1), 94-108. DOI: 10.2307/2491093. Go to original source...
    2. Baker, M., Ruback, R., 1999. Estimating Industry Multiples. Harvard University. Available from: <https://www.hbs.edu/faculty/Pages/item.aspx?num=1435>. [26 February 2022].
    3. Budský, P., Dvořák, J., 2017. Average sector multiples - comparison with stock exchange market data. Valuation, 10(4), 3-13. Prague University of Economics and Business: Oeconomica. ISSN: 1803-0785.
    4. Chullen, A., Kaltenbrunner, H., Schwetzler, B., 2015. Does consistency improve accuracy in multiple-based valuation? Journal of Business Economics, 85(6), 635-662. DOI: 10.1007/s11573-015-0768-2. Go to original source...
    5. Damodaran, A., 2022. Damodaran Online. Available from: <https://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/>. [26 February 2022].
    6. De Bondt, W. F. M., Thaler, R. H., 1987. Further Evidence on Investor Overreaction and Stock Market Seasonality. Journal of Finance, 42(3), 557-581. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1987.tb04569.x. Go to original source...
    7. Demirakos, E. G., Strong, N. C., Walker, M., 2004. What Valuation Models Do Analysts Use? Accounting Horizons, 18(4), 221-240. DOI: 10.2308/acch.2004.18.4.221. Go to original source...
    8. Dittmann, I., Maug, E. G., 2008. Biases and Error Measures: How to Compare Valuation Methods. SSRN Electronic Journal. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.947436. Go to original source...
    9. Eberhart, A. C., 2004. Equity Valuation Using Multiples. Journal of Investing, 13(2), 48-54. DOI: 10.3905/joi.2004.412306. Go to original source...
    10. Fama, E. F., 1970. Efficient Capital Markets: A Review of Theory and Empirical Work. Journal of Finance, 25(2), 383-417. DOI: 10.2307/2325486. Go to original source...
    11. Fernandez, P., 2002. Valuation using multiples. How do analysts reach their conclusions? IESE Research Paper No D/450. IESE Business School. Available from: <https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ebg:iesewp:d-0450>. [26 February 2022]. Go to original source...
    12. Gilson, S. C., Hotchkiss, E. S., Ruback, R. S., 2000. Valuation of Bankrupt Firms. Review of Financial Studies, 13(1), 43-74. DOI: 10.1093/rfs/13.1.43. Go to original source...
    13. Green, J., Hand, J. R. M., Zhang, X. F., 2016. Errors and questionable judgments in analysts' DCF models. Review of Accounting Studies, 21(2), 596-632. DOI: 10.1007/s11142-016-9352-4. Go to original source...
    14. Gupta, V., 2018. Predicting Accuracy of Valuation Multiples Using Value Drivers: Evidence from Indian Listed Firms. Theoretical Economics Letters, 8(5), 755-772. DOI: 10.4236/tel.2018.85052. Go to original source...
    15. Kaplan, S. N., Ruback, R. S., 1995. The Valuation of Cash Flow Forecasts: An Empirical Analysis. Journal of Finance, 50(4), 1059-1093. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1995.tb04050.x. Go to original source...
    16. Kim, M., Ritter, J. R., 1999. Valuing IPOs. Journal of Financial Economics, 53(3), 409-437. DOI: 10.1016/s0304-405x(99)00027-6. Go to original source...
    17. Lie, E., Lie, H. J., 2002. Multiples Used to Estimate Corporate Value. Financial Analysts Journal, 58(2), 44-54. DOI: 10.2469/faj.v58.n2.2522. Go to original source...
    18. Liu, J., Nissim, D., Thomas, J., 2002. Equity Valuation Using Multiples. Journal of Accounting Research, 40(1), 135-172. DOI: 10.1111/1475-679x.00042. Go to original source...
    19. Mařík, M. et al., 2018. Metody oceňování podniku: proces ocenění, základní metody a postupy [Business valuation methods: valuation process, basic methods and procedures]. 4th Edition. Prague: Ekopress. ISBN: 978-80-87865-38-5.
    20. Mittnik, S., Rieken, S., 2000. Lower-boundary violations and market efficiency: Evidence from the German DAX-index options market. Journal of Futures Markets, 20(5), 405-424. DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1096-9934(200005)20:5<405::aid-fut1>3.0.co;2-5. Go to original source...
    21. Nel, W. S., Bruwer, B. W., Le Roux, N. J., 2013. Equity- And Entity-Based Multiples In Emerging Markets: Evidence From The JSE Securities Exchange. Journal of Applied Business Research, 29(3), 829-851. DOI: 10.19030/jabr.v29i3.7784. Go to original source...
    22. Nugent, J., 1990. Further evidence of forward exchange market efficiency: an application of cointegration using German and UK data. Economic and Social Review, 22(1), 35-42.
    23. Plíhal, T., 2016. Stock Market Informational Efficiency in Germany: Granger Causality between DAX and Selected Macroeconomic Indicators. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 220, 321-329. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.505. Go to original source...
    24. S&P Capital IQ, 2022. S&P Global Market Intelligence. Available from: <https://www.capitaliq.com/>. [26 February 2022].
    25. Schreiner, A., Spremann, K., 2007. Multiples and Their Valuation Accuracy in European Equity Markets. SSRN Electronic Journal. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.957352. Go to original source...
    26. Serra, R. G., Fávero, L. P. L., 2018. Multiples' Valuation: The Selection of Cross-Border Comparable Firms. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 54(9), 1973-1992. DOI: 10.1080/1540496x.2017.1336084. Go to original source...
    27. Yoo, K. Y., 2006. The valuation accuracy of equity valuation using a combination of multiples. Review of Accounting and Finance, 5(2), 108-123. DOI: 10.1108/14757700610668958. Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content