European Financial and Accounting Journal 2021, 16(2):29-50 | DOI: 10.18267/j.efaj.254

Real Convergence in the European Union. Bridging the Gap between the New and Old Member States

Ana-Maria Holobiuc ORCID...1
1 The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Romania

One of the fundamental pillars of the European Union aims at the convergence of economic performances among its Member States. This objective has become increasingly challenging with the advancement of the integration process from the customs union to the economic and monetary union, from the six founding Members to twenty-seven European states. The aim of this paper is to study real convergence in the European Union between 2000 and 2019 and conducting also a comparative analysis between the New and the Old Members. The methodological tools imply absolute and conditional β- and σ-convergence. By using cross-sectional regressions, we have found evidence in favour of the absolute β-convergence hypothesis, as the initially poorer Members experienced higher GDP per capita growth rates than the developed economies. The average catching-up speed in the European Union was 2.5%, while the Central and Eastern Members experienced a higher convergence rate, which reached 3.6%. Moreover, by applying panel regressions, we have found evidence supporting the conditional convergence hypothesis, the study emphasising the role of macroeconomic, social, and governance-related variables in promoting economic growth. Our research suggests that investment and trade had a major role in enhancing economic growth both at the aggregate and subgroup level. Finally, the paper illustrates that β-convergence was accompanied by a reduction of disparities within the European Union. However, the global financial crisis hampered the convergence process among the Old Members. The paper suggests that although the Central and Eastern European countries made important progress in terms of catching-up, convergence of economic performance in the European Union has not been reached so far. By contrast, the modest growth rates and the exacerbation of income differentials between the Old Members might call into question the perspective to achieve this objective in the short term.

Keywords: European Union; Real Convergence; Central and Eastern Europe; β-convergence; σ-convergence
JEL classification: O40, O52, O57

Published: December 20, 2021  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Holobiuc, A. (2021). Real Convergence in the European Union. Bridging the Gap between the New and Old Member States. European Financial and Accounting Journal16(2), 29-50. doi: 10.18267/j.efaj.254
Download citation

References

  1. Alcidi, C., Núñez Ferrer, J., Di Salvo, M., Pilati, M., Musmeci, R., 2018. Income Convergence in the EU: A Tale of Two Speeds. CEPS Commentary. Centre for European Policy Studies.
  2. Barro, R. J., Sala-i-Martin, X., 1990. Economic Growth and Convergence across The United States. NBER Working Paper no. 3419. Go to original source...
  3. Barro, R. J. and Sala-i-Martin, X., 1992. Convergence. Journal of Political Economy, 100(2), 223-251. Go to original source...
  4. Barro, R. J., 2012. Convergence and Modernization Revisited. NBER Working Paper no. 18295, National Bureau of Economic Research. Go to original source...
  5. Dobrinsky, R., Havlik, P., 2014. Economic Convergence and Structural Change: the Role of Transition and EU Accession. Wiiw Research Report No. 395. The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies.
  6. Dobrinsky, R., 2013. What is Happening to Growth in Europe? Wiiw Research Report No. 385. The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies.
  7. Eurostat. Database. Available from: <ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database>. [17 September 2021].
  8. Lucas, R., 1988. On the mechanics of economic development. Journal of Monetary Economics, 22(1), 3-42. Go to original source...
  9. Ramsey, F. P., 1928. A Mathematical Theory of Saving. Economic Journal, London, 38(152), 543-559. Go to original source...
  10. Rapacki, R., Próchniak, M., 2009. The EU enlargement and economic growth in the CEE new member countries. European Economy. Economic Paper 367. Brussels: European Commission.
  11. Rapacki, R., Prochniak, M., 2019. EU membership and economic growth: Empirical evidence for the CEE countries. European Journal of Comparative Economics, 16(1), 3-40.
  12. Romer, P. M., 1989. Human Capital and Growth: Theory and Evidence. NBER Working Paper No. 3173. National Bureau of Economic Research. Go to original source...
  13. Solow, R. M., 1956. A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70(1), 65-94. Go to original source...
  14. Stanišić, N., 2012. The effects of the economic crisis on income convergence in the European Union. Acta Oeconomica, 62(2), 161-182. Go to original source...
  15. Stoica, O., Roman, A., Diaconaşu, D. E., 2019. Real Convergence and European Integration with Focus on the New Member States. Scientific Annals of Economics and Business, 66(SI2), 215-228. Go to original source...
  16. Swan, T. W., 1956. Economic growth and capital accumulation. The Economic Record. 32(2), 334-361. Go to original source...
  17. Vojinović, B., Acharya, S., Próchniak, M., 2009. Convergence Analysis Among the Ten European Transition Economies. Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics, 50(2), 17-35.
  18. World Bank. Data. Available from: <data.worldbank.org/>. [17 September 2021].

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.