European Financial and Accounting Journal 2021, 16(2):05-28 | DOI: 10.18267/j.efaj.253

Human Freedom and Effective Corporate Income Tax Rates of CEE Listed Companies

Marina Purina
Faculty of Finance and Accounting, Prague University of Economics and Business,
Czech Republic; e-mail: marina.purina@vse.cz; Orcid ID: 0000-0003-2206-8965

This paper analyses firm-specific and country-specific factors that have an impact on the effective corporate income tax rates (ETR) for CEE listed companies based on data obtained from the BvD Amadeus database. Business factors analysed in this research are the company size, leverage, capital and inventory intensity, and return on assets. Concerning the country-specific factors, chosen were the statutory corporate income tax rate and cultural factors represented by personal and economic freedoms covered by the Human Freedom Index (HFI), making this study different from others. The tested hypotheses predict significance of all the stated variables. Nine models were analysed based on three ETR denominators (EBT; turnover; cash flow) and three groups of countries (whole sample; sample excluding Russia; sample consisted of Bulgaria, Croatia, Poland, and Romania). Based on the panel data regression analysis and particularly the Feasible Generalised Least Squares estimator, a significant impact on the ETR was found for all variables in all the models. The main variable of interest, the HFI, came always with a negative coefficient demonstrating that, for CEE countries, a higher level of freedom is associated with a lower ETR. Findings for the remaining variables are in line with the existing literature.

Keywords: Effective corporate tax rate; Firm-specific factors; Country-specific factors; Human Freedom Index.
JEL classification: H25, M41

Published: December 20, 2021  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Purina, M. (2021). Human Freedom and Effective Corporate Income Tax Rates of CEE Listed Companies. European Financial and Accounting Journal, 16(2), 05-28. doi: 10.18267/j.efaj.253
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Allingham, M.G., Sandmo, A., 1972. Income Tax Evasion: A Theoretical Analysis. Journal of Public Economics 1, 3-4, 323-338. Go to original source...
    2. Álvarez, I. C., Barbero, J., Zofío, J. L., 2017. A Panel Data Toolbox for MATLAB. Journal of Statistical Software 76, 6, 1-27. Available from: <paneldatatoolbox.com/>. [20 December 2016]. Go to original source...
    3. Audit-it, 2017. Nalogovoe planirovanie. Available from: <audit-it.ru/terms/taxation/nalogovoe_planirovanie.html>. [14 July 2021].
    4. Becker, G., 1983. A Theory of Competition Among Pressure Groups for Political Influence. Quarterly Journal of Economics 98, 3, 371-400. Go to original source...
    5. Bell, A., Fairbrother, M., Jones, K., 2019. Fixed and Random Effects Models: Making an Informed Choice. Quality & Quantity 53, 2, 1051-1074. Go to original source...
    6. Berenson, M., 2018. Creating Post-communist Tax Regimes and Measuring Tax Compliance. In Taxes and Trust: From Coercion to Compliance in Poland, Russia and Ukraine, 96-136. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Go to original source...
    7. Cummings, R. G., Martinez-Vazquez, J., McKee, M., Torgler, B., 2004. Effects of Culture on Tax Compliance: A Cross Check of Experimental and Survey Evidence. Working paper No. 2004-13, Centre for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts. Go to original source...
    8. DeBacker, J., Bradley, T. H., Tran, A., 2015. Importing Corruption Culture from Overseas: Evidence from Corporate Tax Evasion in the United States. Journal of Financial Economics 117, 1, 122-138. Go to original source...
    9. Derashid, C., Zhang, H., 2003. Effective tax rates and the "industrial policy" hypothesis: evidence from Malaysia. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation 12, 45-62. Go to original source...
    10. Fatica, S., Hemmelgarn, T., Nicodème, G., 2012. The Debt-Equity Tax Bias: consequences and solutions. Taxation Paper No. 33, European Commission. Go to original source...
    11. Fernández-Rodríguez, E., García-Fernández, R., Martínez-Arias, A. 2020. Business and Institutional Determinants of ETR in Emerging Economies. Economic Modelling. In press. Go to original source...
    12. Fernández-Rodríguez, E., Martínez-Arias, A., 2014. Determinants of the effective tax rate in the BRIC countries. Emerging Markets Finance Trade 50, 214-228. Go to original source...
    13. Fonseca-Díaz, A.R., Fernández-Rodríguez, E., Martínez-Arias, A., 2014. Geographic and Institutional Determinants of International Tax Burden for Corporate Income Tax. Journal of Global Competition Governability 8, 16-32. Go to original source...
    14. Frey, B. S., Torgler, B., 2007. Tax Morale and Conditional Cooperation. Journal of Comparative Economics 35(1), 136-159. Go to original source...
    15. Gulev, R. E., Lierse, H., 2011. Exploring the Connection between Culture and Taxation: How Trust and Confidence Shape Tax Regimes within Europe. In: MIC 2011: Managing Sustainability? [Conference Proceedings]. Portorož: University of Primorska, Faculty of Management Koper. Available from: <ideas.repec.org/h/mgt/micp11/1065-1083.html>. [20 July 2019].
    16. Gupta, S., Newberry, K. 1997. Determinants of the Variability in Corporate Effective Tax Rates: Evidence from Longitudinal Data. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 16, 1, 1-34. DOI: 10.1016/S0278-4254(96)00055-5. Go to original source...
    17. Hofstede, G, J., 2015. Dimension Data Matrix. Available from: <geerthofstede.com/research-and-vsm/dimension-data-matrix/>. [10 January 2020].
    18. Inglehart, R., Haerpfer, C., Moreno, A., Welzel, C., Kizilova, K., Diez-Medrano, J., Lagos, M., Norris, P., Ponarin, E., Puranen, B. et al. (eds.), 2014. World Values Survey: Round Six - Country-Pooled Datafile Version, Madrid: JD Systems Institute. Available from: <worldvaluessurvey.org/WVSDocument ationWV6.jsp>. [15 January 2020].
    19. Kaplan, M. et al., 2016. Shape Culture. Drive Strategy. Deloitte Insights. Available from: <https://www2.deloitte.com/us/en/insights/focus/human-capital-trends/2016/impact-of-culture-on-business-strategy.html>. [17 April 2020].
    20. Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., Mastruzzi, M., 2011. The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Methodology and Analytical Issues. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law 3(2), 220-246. Go to original source...
    21. Kountouris, Y., Remoundou, K., 2013. Is There a Cultural Component in Tax Morale? Evidence from Immigrants in Europe. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 96, 104-119. Go to original source...
    22. KPMG, 2021. Corporate Tax Rates Table. Available from: <home.kpmg/xx/en/home/services/tax/tax-tools-and-resources/tax-rates-online/corporate-tax-rates-table.html>. [13 July 2021].
    23. Kubátová, K., Říhová, L., 2009. Regresní analýza faktorů ovlivňujících výnosy korporativní daně v zemích OECD. Politická ekonomie 57, 4, 451-470.. Go to original source...
    24. Lazar, S., 2013. Effective Corporate Taxation in Romania. Evidence from the Bucharest Stock Exchange. Eastern European Economics 51, 4, 50-83.. Go to original source...
    25. Lazar S., 2014. Determinants of the Variability of Corporate Effective Tax Rates. Evidence from the Romanian Listed Companies. Emerging Markets, Finance and Trade 50 (4), 113-131.. Go to original source...
    26. Livingston, M., 2020. Tax and Culture: Convergence, Divergence, and the Future of Tax Law. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. ISBN: 978-1-107-13684-7. Go to original source...
    27. Luttmer, E. F. P., Singhal, M., 2014. Tax Morale. The Journal of Economic Perspectives 28, 4, 149-168. Go to original source...
    28. Miller, T., Kim, A. B., 2016. 2016 Index of Economic Freedom. Wall Street Journal, New York. Available from: <heritage.org/index/pdf/2016/book/index_2016.pdf>. [20 December 2020].
    29. Molina-Morales, A., Amate-Fortes, I., Guarnido-Rueda, A., 2011. Economic and Institutional Determinants in Fiscal Pressure: an Application to the European Case. Journal of Economic Issues 45, 573-591. Go to original source...
    30. Němec, D., Dulák, S., 2017. Modelling effective corporate tax rate in the Czech Republic. In: Pavel Pražák, 35th International Conference Mathematical Methods in Economics MME 2017 Conference Proceedings, Hradec Králové: Faculty of Informatics and Management, University of Hradec Králové, 2017, 511-516, ISBN 978-80-7435-678-0. Available from: <fim2.uhk.cz/mme/index.php?page= conferenceproceedings>. [20 February 2020].
    31. Nicodème, G., 2007. Comparing effective corporate tax rates. Frontiers in Finance and Economics 4, 2, 102-131.
    32. Podviezko, A., Parfenova, L., Pugachev, A., 2019. Tax Competitiveness of the New EU Member States. Journal of Risk and Financial Management 12, 34. Go to original source...
    33. Posner, E., 2000. Law and Social Norms: The Case of Tax Compliance. Virginia Law Review 86(8), 1781-1819. Go to original source...
    34. Purina, M., 2017. Factors Affecting Effective Corporate Income Tax Rate of the Czech and Russian "Blue Chips" in 2012 - 2015. European Financial and Accounting Journal 12, 1, 51-69. Go to original source...
    35. Sedmihradsky, M., Klazar, S., 2002. Tax Competition for FDI in Central-European Countries, CESifo Working Paper No. 647, Center for Economic Studies and ifo Institute (CESifo), Munich. Available from: <econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/76066/1/cesifo_wp647.pdf>. [31 October 2020]. Go to original source...
    36. Sugeng, E. P., Zaman, B., 2020. Does capital intensity, inventory intensity, firm size, firm risk, and political connections affect tax aggressiveness? JEMA: Jurnal Ilmiah Bidang Akuntansi dan Manajemen 17, 1, 2020, 78-87. Go to original source...
    37. Torgler, B., 2007. Tax Compliance and Tax Morale: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham. ISBN: 9781845427207. Go to original source...
    38. Torgler, B., Schneider, F., 2004. Does Culture Influence Tax Morale? Evidence from Different European Countries. Working Paper No. 2004-17, Centre for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts. Available from: <researchgate.net/publication/4762280_Does_Culture_Influence_Tax_Morale_Evidence_from_Different_European_Countries>. [28 February 2020].
    39. The Heritage Foundation, 2020. The Index of Economic Freedom. Available from: <heritage.org/index/about>. [31 October 2020].
    40. Traxler, Ch., 2005. Tax Evasion, Social Norms and Conditional Cooperation. Available from: <d-nb.info/978943503/34>. [15 July 2021].
    41. Trüdinger, E.-V., Hildebrandt, A., 2013. Causes and Contexts of Tax Morale: Rational Considerations, Community Orientations, and Communist Rule. International Political Science Review 34, 2, 191-209. Available from: <jstor.com/stable/23353494>. [27 June 2020]. Go to original source...
    42. Tsakumis, G. T., Curatola, A. P., Porcano, T. M., 2007. The Relation between National Cultural Dimensions and Tax Evasion. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation 16, 131-147. Go to original source...
    43. Van Pelt, V. F. J., 2020. When and how to cluster standard errors in experimental data? Accounting Experiments. Available from: <accountingexperiments.com/post/clustering/>. [14 July 2021].
    44. Vásquez, I., Porcnik, T., 2017-2020. The Human Freedom Index. Available from: <cato.org/human-freedom-index>. [17 May 2020].
    45. Vásquez, I., McMahon, F., 2021. The Human Freedom Index. Available from: <cato.org/human-freedom-index>. [17 April 2021].
    46. Williamson, C., Mathers, R. 2011. Economic Freedom, Culture, and Growth. Public Choice 148, 313-335. Go to original source...
    47. Zimmerman, J. 1983. Taxes and Firm Size. Journal of Accounting and Economics 5, 1, 119-149. Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content