European Financial and Accounting Journal 2017, 12(4):31-46 | DOI: 10.18267/j.efaj.199

International Tax Planning: Current State of Knowledge

Vít Jedlička
University of Pardubice, Faculty of Economics and Administration, Institute of Business Economics and Management, Studentská 95, 532 10 Pardubice, Czech Republic.

Globalisation affects the behaviour of managers of companies and brings many new possibilities in management. These changes affect activities related to tax optimization and they can be collectively called as international tax planning. This paper monitors current situation of tax planning activities and its aim is to present a current state of knowledge. It contains data showing high frequency of tax planning activities. There are briefly outlined ways of international tax optimization and attitude of organisations to the tax planning of multinationals corporations. Significant part of this paper is devoted to the overview of literature, which deals with measuring international tax optimization. There are several attitudes in selected studies that can be also used (with adaptation to the different data) for monitoring of situation in the Czech Republic. Overall, the most attitudes use applications of effective tax rate and this rate, which is for every country and corporation different, is a key factor for tax planning decision-making.

Keywords: International tax planning, Tax optimization, Profit shifting
JEL classification: H25, M29

Published: February 1, 2018  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Jedlička, V. (2017). International Tax Planning: Current State of Knowledge. European Financial and Accounting Journal12(4), 31-46. doi: 10.18267/j.efaj.199
Download citation

References

  1. Bennedsen, M., Zeume, S., 2015. Corporate Tax Havens and Transparency. Asian Finance Association (AsianFA) 2016 Conference. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2725577. Go to original source...
  2. Bisnode, 2016. Zájem o daňové ráje letos klesá. 11 October 2016. Bisnode. Available from: [19 December 2016].
  3. Delgado, F. J., Fernandez-Rodriguez, E., Martinez-Arias, A., 2014. Effective Tax Rates in Corporate Taxation: a Quantile Regression for the EU. Engineering Economics 25, 487-496. DOI: 10.5755/j01.ee.25.5.4531. Go to original source...
  4. Dischinger, M., Knoll, B., Riedel, N., 2014. The role of headquarters in multinational profit shifting strategies. International Tax and Public Finance 21, 248-271. DOI: 10.1007/s10797-012-9265-5. Go to original source...
  5. Dyreng, S. D., Hanlon, M., Maydew, E. L., Thornock, J. R., 2016. Changes in Corporate Effective Tax Rates Over the Past Twenty-Five Years. Journal of Financial Economics 124, 441-463. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2521497. Go to original source...
  6. European Commission, 2015. The Impact of Tax Planning on Forward-Looking Effective Tax Rates. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2016. Available from: [4 January 2017].
  7. European Commission, 2016. COMMISSION DECISION of 30.8.2016 ON STATE AID SA.38373 (2014/C) (ex 2014/NN) (ex 2014/CP) implemented by Ireland to Apple. Available from: [3 January 2017].
  8. Gravelle, J. G., 2015. Congressional Research Service. 15 January 2015. Tax Havens: International Tax Avoidance and Evasion. Available from: [9 January 2017].
  9. Jánský, P., Prats, A., 2015. International Profit-Shifting out of Developing Countries and the Role of Tax Havens. Development Policy Review 33, 271-292. DOI: 10.1111/dpr.12113. Go to original source...
  10. Lunder, E. K., Pettit, C. A., 2016. Congressional Research Service. 7 September 2016. FATCA Reporting on U.S. Accounts: Recent Legal Developments. Available from: [15 April 2017].
  11. Maffini, G., 2009. Oxford University Centre for Business Taxation. September 2009. Tax Haven Activities and the Tax Liabilities of Multinational Groups. Available from: [25 January 2017].
  12. Markle, K. S., Shackelford, D. A., 2014. The Impact of Headquarter and Subsidiary Locations on Multinationals' Effective Tax Rates. Tax Policy and the Economy 28, 33-62. DOI: 10.1086/675587. Go to original source...
  13. OECD, 1998. Harmful Tax Competition - An Emerging Global Issue. OECD Publications. Paris, France. Available from: [25 January 2017]. DOI: 10.1787/9789264162945-en. Go to original source...
  14. OECD, 2017. BEPS Actions. Available from: [3 January 2017].
  15. OECD, 2017. Glossary of Tax Terms. Available from: [15 April 2017].
  16. OECD, 2017. The BEPS Package. Available from: [3 January 2017].
  17. Phillips, R., Gardner, M., Kitson, K., Robins, A., Surka, M., 2016. Offshore Shell Games 2016. The Use of Offshore Tax Havens by Fortune 500 Companies. Available from: [20 January 2017].
  18. Pomerleau, K., 2014. Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA) Goes Into Force Today. 1 July 2014. Tax Foundation. Available from: [15 April 2017].
  19. Pomerleau, K., 2016. International Tax Competitiveness Index 2016. Tax Foundation, Washington.
  20. Schulte S. K., Thomsen, M., Watrin, C., 2017. Do European corporate groups with subsidiaries in tax havens avoid more taxes than others? SSRN Electronic Journal. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2897655. Go to original source...
  21. Vartia, L., 2008. How do Taxes Affect Investment and Productivity? An Industry-Level Analysis of OECD Countries. Working Paper, No. 656, OECD Publishing, Paris. DOI: 10.1787/230022721067. Go to original source...
  22. VK DATA, 2013. Fiscal avalanche in tax haven the Netherlands. 5 April 2013. De Volkskrant Data Blog. Available from: [22 December 2016].
  23. Wiebe, T., 2011. The Benefits of Tax Competition. 25 July 2011. Tax Foundation. Available from: [15 April 2017].

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.